Expense Ratio Rating
0 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
10 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
10 /10
$BWG Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- eeiix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ahtcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
American Funds American High-Income Trust® Class C
Expenses: 1.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- jahyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Janus Henderson High-Yield Fund Class T
Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pygsx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Payden Global Low Duration Fund
Expenses: 0.53% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- oosax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco Oppenheimer Senior Floating Rate Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- oibax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco Oppenheimer International Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- asbcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
American Funds Short-Term Bond Fund of America® Class C
Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- flbl
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Franklin Liberty Senior Loan ETF
Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ifrix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Voya Floating Rate Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »