Expense Ratio Rating
9 /10
Expense Rating
7 /10
Market Score
1 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
1 /10
$BSDE Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- esicx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Wells Fargo International Bond Fund - Class Inst
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- emcb
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund
Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- eshix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Eaton Vance Short Duration High Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- kcny
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
KraneShares E Fund China Commercial Paper ETF
Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- chicx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Credit Suisse Floating Rate High Income Fund C
Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- nehyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Loomis Sayles High Income Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- abhix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
American Century High-Yield Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ashcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
AllianzGI Short Duration High Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- rfrax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Columbia Floating Rate Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »