Expense Ratio Rating
9 /10
Expense Rating
7 /10
Market Score
1 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
1 /10
$BSBE Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- mwcbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Metropolitan West Corporate Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pelax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dfrtx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
DWS Floating Rate Fund - Class Inst
Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ssiix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Sierra Tactical Core Income Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- emsh
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
ProShares Short Term USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- agivx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco Income Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- giocx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Guggenheim Macro Opportunities Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- rldax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Victory INCORE Low Duration Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pubcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PIMCO Dynamic Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »