Expense Ratio Rating
7 /10
Expense Rating
3 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$BRUDX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 566 US Stocks Large Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- zdivx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Zacks Dividend Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- pwdix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Power Dividend Index Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- dalvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Dunham Large Cap Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- tvvix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Guggenheim RBP® Large-Cap Value Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- nwgyx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Nationwide Ziegler Equity Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- ecfvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opportunities Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- segpx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Guggenheim Large Cap Value Fund Class P
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- hcmax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Hillman Value Fund No Load Shares
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- mvebx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Meritage Value Equity Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »