• adgcx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Growth

AB Core Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

• adpcx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

AB Short Duration Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• arcm
• ETF
• Alternative
• Short

Arrow Reserve Capital Management ETF

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

• ardgx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Value

Archer Dividend Growth Fund

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

• nnhix
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Nicholas High Income Fund Class N

Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• nqvax
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Mid-Cap Value

Nuveen NWQ Multi Cap Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

• nsccx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Small Blend

Nuveen NWQ Small-Cap Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• nsmvx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Small Value

North Star Micro Cap Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

• atgcx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Mid-Cap Blend

Aquila Three Peaks Opportunity Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• stlfx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Target-Date

BlackRock LifePath® Dynamic 2050 Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »