• btpix
• Mutual Fund
• Alternatives
• Short

Salient Tactical Plus Fund Class F

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

• caycx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• Municipal Bond

American Century California High Yield Municipal Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

• crarx
• Mutual Fund
• Alternatives
• Real Estate

MainStay CBRE Real Estate Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.91% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

• febcx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Total World

First Eagle Global Income Builder Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

• ffecx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Value

Nuveen Dividend Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

• csmix
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Small Value

Columbia Small Cap Value Fund I Class A

Expenses: 1.32% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

• fgbfx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• International

Fidelity® Global Credit Fund

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a International Bond fund. See why »

• heoix
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Total World

Hartford Climate Opportunities Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

• bbc
• ETF
• Sector Equity
• Healthcare

Virtus LifeSci Biotech Clinical Trials ETF

Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

• ihiyx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Transamerica High Yield Bond A

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »