Expense Ratio Rating
5 /10
Expense Rating
1 /10
Market Score
1 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
1 /10
$BMHAX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- pmzcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PIMCO Mortgage Opportunities and Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- afrcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco Floating Rate Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- evfhx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- giocx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Guggenheim Macro Opportunities Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- msdix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
MainStay MacKay Unconstrained Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- jhbtx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Janus Henderson Global Bond Fund Class T
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- kcny
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
KraneShares E Fund China Commercial Paper ETF
Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- nehyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Loomis Sayles High Income Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- gifpx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Guggenheim Floating Rate Strategies Fund Class P
Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »