Expense Ratio Rating
9 /10
Expense Rating
7 /10
Market Score
7 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
7 /10
$BMBIX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 746 Bond Municipal Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- ghyax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Goldman Sachs High Yield Municipal Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mayhx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
BlackRock High Yield Municipal Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hltax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
JPMorgan Municipal Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.44% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pzt
- ETF
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.28% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ncaax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Nuveen California Municipal Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hmop
- ETF
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF
Expenses: 0.30% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- minmx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
BNY Mellon National Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class Investor
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hhmax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Hartford Municipal Opportunities Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.69% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- prnyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
T. Rowe Price New York Tax-Free Bond Fund
Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »