Expense Ratio Rating
3 /10
Expense Rating
1 /10
Market Score
0 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
0 /10
$BKTAX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 746 Bond Municipal Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- aztcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Aquila Tax-Free Trust of Arizona Class C
Expenses: 1.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- vmttx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Viking Tax-Free Fund For Montana Class A
Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- kntcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
DWS New York Tax-Free Income Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dhycx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
BNY Mellon High Yield Municipal Bond Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- opcmx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Invesco Oppenheimer Municipal Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- okmux
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Oklahoma Municipal Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- avacx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
AB Municipal Income Fund II Virginia Portfolio Class C
Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- wwtcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Wells Fargo Wisconsin Tax-Free Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- lctcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Columbia Connecticut Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »