BISAX : Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class A

BISAX is a International Stocks Market Mid-Cap Value with HIGH fees.

BISAX

Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class A

FI Score

34 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

2 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

6 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

6 /10

Different Funds

We found 9,859 International Stocks Mid-Cap Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare BISAX vs PYHRX

48% FI Score
  • pyhrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Payden High Income Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.62% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare BISAX vs MMHBX

48% FI Score
  • mmhbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

MFS Municipal High Income Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare BISAX vs JGRCX

48% FI Score
  • jgrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Janus Henderson Enterprise Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BISAX vs RYTRX

48% FI Score
  • rytrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Royce Total Return Fund Investment Class

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BISAX vs MTZIX

48% FI Score
  • mtzix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Manning & Napier Target 2055 Series Class I

Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare BISAX vs MTMAX

48% FI Score
  • mtmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

MainStay MacKay Total Return Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare BISAX vs SENCX

48% FI Score
  • sencx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Touchstone Large Cap Focused Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BISAX vs FSCAX

48% FI Score
  • fscax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Nuveen Small Cap Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BISAX vs NETL

48% FI Score
  • netl
  • ETF
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Fundamental Income Net Lease Real Estate ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare BISAX vs FSMB

48% FI Score
  • fsmb
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

First Trust Short Duration Managed Municipal ETF

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare BISAX vs NVHCX

48% FI Score
  • nvhcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Nuveen Short Duration High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class C2

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare BISAX vs TNEAX

48% FI Score
  • tneax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Invesco Balanced-Risk Retirement 2050 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare BISAX vs OARLX

48% FI Score
  • oarlx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Oakmark Select Fund Service Class

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BISAX vs NWFAX

48% FI Score
  • nwfax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Nationwide Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BISAX vs LSDRX

48% FI Score
  • lsdrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Loomis Sayles Intermediate Duration Bond Fund A Class

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare BISAX vs OCIO

48% FI Score
  • ocio
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

ClearShares OCIO ETF

Expenses: 0.67% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare BISAX vs TMAFX

47% FI Score
  • tmafx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class S

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare BISAX vs UTBPX

47% FI Score
  • utbpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

UBS Total Return Bond Fund Class P

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare BISAX vs URA

47% FI Score
  • ura
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Global X Uranium ETF

Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare BISAX vs URTY

47% FI Score
  • urty
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProShares UltraPro Russell2000

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo