BIL : SPDR Bloomberg Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF

BIL is a Alternative Market Short with LOW fees.

BIL

SPDR Bloomberg Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF

FI Score

81 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

10 /10

Expense Rating

9 /10

Market Score

10 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

10 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,034 Alternative Short funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare BIL vs AMFQX

17% FI Score
  • amfqx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

361 Managed Futures Strategy Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 2.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare BIL vs PFSEX

17% FI Score
  • pfsex
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

PFG JP Morgan Tactical Aggressive Strategy Fund Class R

Expenses: 2.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BIL vs BXEAX

17% FI Score
  • bxeax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Barings Emerging Markets Debt Blended Total Return Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare BIL vs QMLAX

17% FI Score
  • qmlax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Quantified Market Leaders Fund Advisor Class

Expenses: 2.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BIL vs BXHAX

17% FI Score
  • bxhax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Barings U.S. High Yield Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare BIL vs CASAX

17% FI Score
  • casax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific Stock

Columbia Pacific/Asia Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BIL vs CAXCX

17% FI Score
  • caxcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Catalyst/MAP Global Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare BIL vs PGYCX

17% FI Score
  • pgycx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Pioneer Global High Yield Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare BIL vs OVECX

17% FI Score
  • ovecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Sterling Capital Mid Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BIL vs CHUSX

17% FI Score
  • chusx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Alger Global Focus Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare BIL vs QCBGX

17% FI Score
  • qcbgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Federated MDT Balanced Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 2.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare BIL vs CUSRX

17% FI Score
  • cusrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Cullen Small Cap Value Fund Class Retail Class

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BIL vs FLCGX

16% FI Score
  • flcgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Meeder Quantex Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BIL vs FLOTX

16% FI Score
  • flotx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Power Floating Rate Index Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare BIL vs FRFDX

16% FI Score
  • frfdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Delaware Floating Rate II Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare BIL vs FLSKX

16% FI Score
  • flskx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Franklin LifeSmart™ 2050 Retirement Target Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare BIL vs GBTFX

16% FI Score
  • gbtfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

U.S. Global Investors All American Equity Fund

Expenses: 1.82% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BIL vs GCLLX

16% FI Score
  • gcllx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Goldman Sachs Flexible Cap Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BIL vs RBCGX

16% FI Score
  • rbcgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Reynolds Blue Chip Growth Fund

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BIL vs RRFCX

16% FI Score
  • rrfcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Federated Real Return Bond Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs up duo thumbs down duo