BICSX : BlackRock Commodity Strategies Portfolio Institutional Shares

BICSX is a Commodities Market Broad with MODERATE fees.

BICSX

BlackRock Commodity Strategies Portfolio Institutional Shares

FI Score

45 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

7 /10

Expense Rating

3 /10

Market Score

5 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

5 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,417 Commodities Broad funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare BICSX vs SBFIX

50% FI Score
  • sbfix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Federated Global Allocation Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare BICSX vs MNOAX

50% FI Score
  • mnoax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

MainStay MacKay New York Tax Free Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare BICSX vs TFFIX

49% FI Score
  • tffix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Touchstone Focused Fund Institutional

Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BICSX vs TNDAX

49% FI Score
  • tndax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Invesco Balanced-Risk Retirement 2040 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare BICSX vs TSVAX

49% FI Score
  • tsvax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

PGIM QMA Small-Cap Value Fund- Class A

Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BICSX vs UGSCX

49% FI Score
  • ugscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

American Funds U.S. Government Securities Fund® Class C

Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare BICSX vs USTB

49% FI Score
  • ustb
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

VictoryShares USAA Core Short-Term Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.34% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare BICSX vs VIISX

49% FI Score
  • viisx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Virtus KAR International Small-Cap Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BICSX vs WFPAX

49% FI Score
  • wfpax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Wells Fargo Special Mid Cap Value Fund - Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BICSX vs WFPDX

49% FI Score
  • wfpdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Wells Fargo Premier Large Company Growth Fund - Class Admin

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BICSX vs WINIX

49% FI Score
  • winix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Wilmington International Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BICSX vs WOOD

49% FI Score
  • wood
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF

Expenses: 0.46% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare BICSX vs WRAAX

49% FI Score
  • wraax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare BICSX vs XCEM

49% FI Score
  • xcem
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF

Expenses: 0.16% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BICSX vs EQL

49% FI Score
  • eql
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF

Expenses: 0.28% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BICSX vs ETV

49% FI Score
  • etv
  • Mutual Fund
  • Other
  • Options-based

Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Options-based Other fund. See why »

Compare BICSX vs EVLMC

49% FI Score
  • evlmc
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Eaton Vance TABS 5-to-15 Year Laddered Municipal Bond NextShares

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare BICSX vs RZG

49% FI Score
  • rzg
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BICSX vs EWZS

49% FI Score
  • ewzs
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Latin America Stock

iShares MSCI Brazil Small-Cap ETF

Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Latin America Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BICSX vs FAFJX

49% FI Score
  • fafjx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Nuveen Limited Term Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo