Expense Ratio Rating
7 /10
Expense Rating
2 /10
Market Score
7 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
7 /10
$BIAGX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 643 US Stocks Large Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- fbgx
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- facex
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Frost Growth Equity Fund Investor Class Shares
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- pnobx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund Class B
Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- cpocx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Morgan Stanley Insight Fund Class L
Expenses: 1.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- aaagx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- sopvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Wells Fargo Opportunity Fund - Class A
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- fkacx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Franklin Growth Opportunities Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- tgusx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
TCW New America Premier Equities Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.82% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- alafx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Alger Focus Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »