• ngvax
• Mutual Fund
• Commodities
• Broad

Nuveen Gresham Diversified Commodity Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

• armzx
• Mutual Fund
• Alternative
• Short

Western Asset Ultra-Short Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

• nqccx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Value

Nuveen NWQ Large Cap Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

• rydax
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Value

Rydex Dow Jones Industrial Average® Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.61% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

• pass
• ETF
• Alternative
• Inverse

Direxion Daily Cnsmr Discret Bear 3XShrs

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

• obmcx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Small Growth

Oberweis Micro-Cap Fund

Expenses: 1.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

• pudcx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• All-In-One

PGIM Real Assets Fund- Class C

Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

• pwdcx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Value

Power Dividend Index Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

• bxeax
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Barings Emerging Markets Debt Blended Total Return Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• bxhax
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Barings U.S. High Yield Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »