BFOR : Barron's 400 ETF

BFOR is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Growth with LOW fees.

BFOR

Barron's 400 ETF

FI Score

40 /100

Diversification Rating

2 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

9 /10

Expense Rating

4 /10

Market Score

2 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

2 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,139 US Stocks Mid-Cap Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare BFOR vs ETO

44% FI Score
  • eto
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Opportunities Fund

Expenses: 2.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare BFOR vs IRL

44% FI Score
  • irl
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Other Region

New Ireland Fund

Expenses: 2.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Region International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BFOR vs PYGNX

44% FI Score
  • pygnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Payden GNMA Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare BFOR vs SPXS

44% FI Score
  • spxs
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares

Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare BFOR vs ESIIX

44% FI Score
  • esiix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Eaton Vance Short Duration Strategic Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.91% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare BFOR vs PRRAX

44% FI Score
  • prrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Principal Real Estate Securities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare BFOR vs PRRJX

44% FI Score
  • prrjx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Putnam RetirementReady 2050 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare BFOR vs AEMVX

44% FI Score
  • aemvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Acadian Emerging Markets Portfolio Class Y

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BFOR vs JTA

44% FI Score
  • jta
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Nuveen Tax-Advantaged Total Return Strategy Fund

Expenses: 2.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare BFOR vs GOF

44% FI Score
  • gof
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund

Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare BFOR vs PTHAX

44% FI Score
  • pthax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Putnam Tax-Free High Yield Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare BFOR vs MTLBX

44% FI Score
  • mtlbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

MFS Municipal Limited Maturity Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare BFOR vs QIVNX

44% FI Score
  • qivnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Invesco Oppenheimer International Equity Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BFOR vs VANTX

44% FI Score
  • vantx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

JPMorgan New York Tax Free Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare BFOR vs LGMCX

44% FI Score
  • lgmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Loomis Sayles Global Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare BFOR vs PRJPX

44% FI Score
  • prjpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Japan Stock

T. Rowe Price Japan Fund

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BFOR vs SEACX

44% FI Score
  • seacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare BFOR vs LBHYX

44% FI Score
  • lbhyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Thrivent High Yield Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare BFOR vs PWLEX

44% FI Score
  • pwlex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

PIMCO RAE Worldwide Long/Short PLUS Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare BFOR vs LTUIX

44% FI Score
  • ltuix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Thornburg Limited Term U.S. Government Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.62% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo