Expense Ratio Rating
2 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$AZMCX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 10,038 International Stocks Emerging Markets funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- afmc
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Blend
First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF
Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- wafax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Government Bond
Western Asset Inflation Indexed Plus Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pjfbx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
PGIM Jennison Growth Fund- Class B
Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- acuix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Columbia Dividend Opportunity Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- acsi
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
American Customer Satisfaction ETF
Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- gscax
- Mutual Fund
- Commodities
- Broad
Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »
- acgcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
American Century Income and Growth Fund C Class
Expenses: 1.67% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- iboax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Ivy Securian Core Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- ntbax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Navigator Tactical Fixed Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- auxix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Auxier Focus Fund Institutional
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- eeiix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- aaaax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- arsqx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Aristotle Value Equity Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- mwflx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Metropolitan West Floating Rate Income Fund Class I Shares
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- oosnx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco Oppenheimer Senior Floating Rate Fund Class R
Expenses: 1.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mvgax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
MFS Low Volatility Global Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- olcax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Invesco Oppenheimer Rochester Limited Term California Municipal Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- camox
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Cambiar Opportunity Fund Class Investor
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- msgfx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Franchise Portfolio Class C
Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »