Expense Ratio Rating
4 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$AYBAX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- nefhx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Loomis Sayles High Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dmo
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Western Asset Mortgage Defined Opportunity Fund Inc.
Expenses: 3.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- rldcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Victory INCORE Low Duration Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dpfcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Deer Park Total Return Credit Fund Class C
Expenses: 3.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ihfax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Integrity High Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bxiax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Barings Global Credit Income Opportunities Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pficx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ahyvx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
American Century High-Yield Fund A Class
Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- rebcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Columbia Emerging Markets Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »