Expense Ratio Rating
2 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
1 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
1 /10
$AUBCX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- emkcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Ashmore Emerging Markets Total Return Fund C Class
Expenses: 2.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- jphcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
JPMorgan Floating Rate Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- idmix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
iM Dolan McEniry Corporate Bond Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- vslax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco Senior Loan Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- xslcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco Senior Loan Fund Class IC
Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- tldax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Thornburg Low Duration Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- zeoix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Zeo Short Duration Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- lbcax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Lord Abbett Corporate Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- rdclx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Columbia Limited Duration Credit Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »