AUBAX : Invesco World Bond Factor Fund Class A

AUBAX is a Bond Market High Yield Bond with MODERATE fees.

AUBAX

Invesco World Bond Factor Fund Class A

FI Score

18 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

5 /10

Expense Rating

1 /10

Market Score

1 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

1 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare AUBAX vs OSCNX

39% FI Score
  • oscnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Invesco Oppenheimer Main Street Small Cap Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AUBAX vs DTCAX

39% FI Score
  • dtcax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

BNY Mellon Sustainable U.S. Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AUBAX vs DUST

39% FI Score
  • dust
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bear 2X Shares

Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare AUBAX vs DVOL

39% FI Score
  • dvol
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AUBAX vs DVYA

39% FI Score
  • dvya
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific Stock

iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF

Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AUBAX vs ECTGX

39% FI Score
  • ectgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Growth 1.1 Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AUBAX vs PFCDX

39% FI Score
  • pfcdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Pacific Funds Large-Cap Advisor Class

Expenses: 0.67% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AUBAX vs ASIAX

39% FI Score
  • asiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Invesco Asia Pacific Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AUBAX vs AGGRX

39% FI Score
  • aggrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

American Century Focused Global Growth Fund A Class

Expenses: 1.32% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare AUBAX vs DGLCX

39% FI Score
  • dglcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

BNY Mellon Global Stock Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare AUBAX vs ASFCX

39% FI Score
  • asfcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare AUBAX vs AIECX

39% FI Score
  • aiecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Invesco International Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AUBAX vs AUIAX

39% FI Score
  • auiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

AB Equity Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AUBAX vs BADIX

39% FI Score
  • badix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

BMO Dividend Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AUBAX vs DVP

39% FI Score
  • dvp
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Deep Value ETF

Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AUBAX vs EEMAX

39% FI Score
  • eemax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Columbia Emerging Markets Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AUBAX vs BAPLX

39% FI Score
  • baplx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

BlackRock LifePath® Smart Beta 2055 Fund Investor A Shares

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare AUBAX vs HSCSX

39% FI Score
  • hscsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Homestead Small Company Stock Fund

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AUBAX vs BTPIX

39% FI Score
  • btpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Salient Tactical Plus Fund Class F

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare AUBAX vs CRARX

39% FI Score
  • crarx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

MainStay CBRE Real Estate Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.91% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo