Expense Ratio Rating
3 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
4 /10
$ATPAX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- rsfcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Victory Floating Rate Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- stsbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Virtus Seix Short-Term Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fcfbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Frost Credit Fund A Class Shares
Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dnfrx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Dunham Floating Rate Bond Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ofinx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco Intermediate Bond Factor Fund Class R
Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- prcpx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund, Inc.
Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- cpatx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Counterpoint Tactical Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- aflex
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Anfield Universal Fixed Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pfuex
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Principal Finisterre Unconstrained Emerging Markets Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »