Expense Ratio Rating
2 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$ATMCX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- cfrix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Catalyst Floating Rate Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- phchx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Virtus Newfleet High Yield Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bmhax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
BMO High Yield Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ecdcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Ashmore Emerging Markets Corporate Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hnrzx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Highland Opportunistic Credit Fund Class Z
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bxeax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Barings Emerging Markets Debt Blended Total Return Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fehcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
First Eagle High Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bxhax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Barings U.S. High Yield Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- plchx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Pacific Funds High Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.65% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »