ASIAX : Invesco Asia Pacific Growth Fund Class A

ASIAX is a International Stocks Market Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock with HIGH fees.

ASIAX

Invesco Asia Pacific Growth Fund Class A

FI Score

39 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

2 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ASIAX vs UJPY

  • ujpy
  • ETF
  • Money Market
  • World

Citigroup ETNs linked to the VelocityShares Daily 4X Long JPY vs. USD Index

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a World Money Market fund. See why »

Compare ASIAX vs CCHYX

  • cchyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Calamos High Income Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ASIAX vs LSHCX

  • lshcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund Advisor Class C

Expenses: 2.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ASIAX vs CNBS

  • cnbs
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Other

Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ASIAX vs CPCEX

  • cpcex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Counterpoint Tactical Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ASIAX vs HTECX

  • htecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Hennessy Technology Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ASIAX vs DXKSX

  • dxksx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

Direxion Monthly 7-10 Year Treasury Bear 2X Fund

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare ASIAX vs RYSCX

  • ryscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Rydex Electronics Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ASIAX vs RYJHX

  • ryjhx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

Rydex Japan 2x Strategy Fund Class H

Expenses: 1.57% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare ASIAX vs RYPIX

  • rypix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Industrials

Rydex Transportation Fund Class Investor

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ASIAX vs RYHCX

  • ryhcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Rydex Health Care Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ASIAX vs IDPIX

  • idpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProFunds Industrial Ultra Sector Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare ASIAX vs RYVAX

  • ryvax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Rydex Energy Services Fund Class H

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ASIAX vs SIMVX

  • simvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

SIM Global Core Managed Volatility Fund Class Z Shares

Expenses: 2.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ASIAX vs MUTE

  • mute
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

Direxion Daily Communication Services Index Bear 3X Shares

Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare ASIAX vs NSBDX

  • nsbdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

North Star Bond Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ASIAX vs OCMAX

  • ocmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

OCM Gold Fund Advisors Class

Expenses: 2.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ASIAX vs ALTY

  • alty
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Global X SuperDividend Alternatives ETF

Expenses: 2.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ASIAX vs APILX

  • apilx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Yorktown Master Allocation Fund Class L

Expenses: 2.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ASIAX vs AUBCX

  • aubcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco World Bond Factor Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo