ASIAX : Invesco Asia Pacific Growth Fund Class A

ASIAX is a International Stocks Market Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock with HIGH fees.

ASIAX

Invesco Asia Pacific Growth Fund Class A

FI Score

39 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

2 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ASIAX vs MIGDX

48% FI Score
  • migdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ASIAX vs MITCX

48% FI Score
  • mitcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

MFS Massachusetts Investors Trust Class C

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ASIAX vs ASVIX

48% FI Score
  • asvix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

American Century Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ASIAX vs HFMRX

48% FI Score
  • hfmrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

The Hartford MidCap Fund Class R3

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ASIAX vs MNA

48% FI Score
  • mna
  • ETF
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF

Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ASIAX vs HMVYX

48% FI Score
  • hmvyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Hartford MidCap Value Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ASIAX vs MRBCX

48% FI Score
  • mrbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

MFS Total Return Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ASIAX vs PSCHX

48% FI Score
  • pschx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

PGIM Jennison Small Company Fund- Class R2

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ASIAX vs PRISX

48% FI Score
  • prisx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

T. Rowe Price Financial Services Fund

Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ASIAX vs PYARX

48% FI Score
  • pyarx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Payden Absolute Return Bond Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ASIAX vs PYHRX

48% FI Score
  • pyhrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Payden High Income Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.62% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ASIAX vs MMHBX

48% FI Score
  • mmhbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

MFS Municipal High Income Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ASIAX vs JGRCX

48% FI Score
  • jgrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Janus Henderson Enterprise Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ASIAX vs RYTRX

48% FI Score
  • rytrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Royce Total Return Fund Investment Class

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ASIAX vs MTZIX

48% FI Score
  • mtzix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Manning & Napier Target 2055 Series Class I

Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ASIAX vs MTMAX

48% FI Score
  • mtmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

MainStay MacKay Total Return Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ASIAX vs SENCX

48% FI Score
  • sencx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Touchstone Large Cap Focused Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ASIAX vs FSCAX

48% FI Score
  • fscax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Nuveen Small Cap Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ASIAX vs NETL

48% FI Score
  • netl
  • ETF
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Fundamental Income Net Lease Real Estate ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ASIAX vs FSMB

48% FI Score
  • fsmb
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

First Trust Short Duration Managed Municipal ETF

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo