Diversification Rating
0 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
7 /10
Expense Rating
4 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
9 /10
$ASHR Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 10,038 International Stocks China Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- epibx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
EuroPac International Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- nginx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Columbia Georgia Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hhccx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Short
Highland Healthcare Opportunities Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »
- flrqx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
Franklin LifeSmart⢠2020 Retirement Target Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- hroax
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Short
Fintrust Income and Opportunity Fund Class A
Expenses: 2.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »
- htacx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Highland Total Return Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- inscx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Catalyst Insider Buying Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- iocax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
ICON Risk-Managed Balanced Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- lshax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund Advisor Class A
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »