Diversification Rating
0 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
7 /10
Expense Rating
4 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
9 /10
$ASHR Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 10,038 International Stocks China Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- lfibx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
MFS Lifetime 2055 Fund Class B
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- lsqcx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Short
Invesco Long/Short Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »
- kntcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
DWS New York Tax-Free Income Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- albcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Alger Growth & Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.82% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- aaccx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
American Century Strategic Allocation: Conservative Fund C Class
Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- acckx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
American Century Core Plus Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- opcmx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Invesco Oppenheimer Municipal Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pcbcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- aelsx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Aberdeen Focused U.S. Equity Fund Institutional Service Class
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »