Diversification Rating
0 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
7 /10
Expense Rating
4 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
9 /10
We found 10,038 International Stocks China Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
Principal Opportunistic Municipal Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
Robinson Tax Advantaged Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
Salient Tactical Plus Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »
DWS Health and Wellness Fund - Class Inst
Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »
Guggenheim RBP® Dividend Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Aggressive-Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
RMB Mendon Financial Long/Short Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »
RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »
Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.
Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!
Join & Get Your First Course Free© 2024 Adam Fortuna
Site Map