ASEA : Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF

ASEA is a International Stocks Market Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock with MODERATE fees.

ASEA

Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF

FI Score

46 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

4 /10

Market Score

3 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

3 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ASEA vs MSSCX

29% FI Score
  • msscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ASEA vs MSSMX

29% FI Score
  • mssmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Inception Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ASEA vs KINAX

29% FI Score
  • kinax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Kinetics Internet Advisor Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ASEA vs KNPYX

29% FI Score
  • knpyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Kinetics Paradigm Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 1.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ASEA vs IIVLX

29% FI Score
  • iivlx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Transamerica Small/Mid Cap Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ASEA vs LFECX

29% FI Score
  • lfecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

MFS Lifetime 2035 Fund Class C

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ASEA vs MTCBX

29% FI Score
  • mtcbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

MFS Technology Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ASEA vs MTCCX

29% FI Score
  • mtccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

MFS Technology Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ASEA vs LTTCX

29% FI Score
  • lttcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund Class C

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ASEA vs IIXIX

29% FI Score
  • iixix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Catalyst Insider Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ASEA vs WGBFX

29% FI Score
  • wgbfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Wells Fargo WealthBuilder Growth Balanced Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ASEA vs PCHSX

29% FI Score
  • pchsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Putnam Global Health Care Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ASEA vs PFRCX

29% FI Score
  • pfrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PIMCO International Bond Fund (Unhedged) Class C

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ASEA vs NCDCX

29% FI Score
  • ncdcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Conservative Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ASEA vs GTALX

29% FI Score
  • gtalx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Goldman Sachs Target Date 2035 Portfolio A Shares

Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ASEA vs NCRCX

29% FI Score
  • ncrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Neuberger Berman Core Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ASEA vs GSZCX

29% FI Score
  • gszcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Goldman Sachs Strategic Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ASEA vs NEJYX

29% FI Score
  • nejyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Natixis Funds Trust I Vaughan Nelson Small Cap Value Fund Class Y

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ASEA vs NELCX

29% FI Score
  • nelcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Nuveen Equity Long/Short Fund Class C

Expenses: 3.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ASEA vs NOIEX

29% FI Score
  • noiex
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Northern Income Equity Fund

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo