APRAX : AAM/Phocas Real Estate Fund Class A Shares

APRAX is a Alternatives Market Real Estate with HIGH fees.

APRAX

AAM/Phocas Real Estate Fund Class A Shares

FI Score

16 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

5 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

1 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

1 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,026 Alternatives Real Estate funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare APRAX vs MFGIX

19% FI Score
  • mfgix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Monteagle Quality Growth Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.32% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare APRAX vs CAJAX

19% FI Score
  • cajax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Columbia Contrarian Asia Pacific Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare APRAX vs DTSGX

19% FI Score
  • dtsgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Wilshire Small Company Growth Portfolio Investment Class Shares

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare APRAX vs MEQAX

19% FI Score
  • meqax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

American Century International Value Fund A Class

Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare APRAX vs TBWCX

19% FI Score
  • tbwcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Thornburg Better World International Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare APRAX vs HOTFX

19% FI Score
  • hotfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

FundX Aggressive Upgrader Fund

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare APRAX vs ATAFX

19% FI Score
  • atafx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

American Trust Allegiance Fund

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare APRAX vs MGILX

19% FI Score
  • mgilx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Corporate Bond Portfolio Class L

Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare APRAX vs LEAOX

19% FI Score
  • leaox
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Advantage Portfolio Open Shares

Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare APRAX vs JMCRX

19% FI Score
  • jmcrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

James Micro Cap Fund

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare APRAX vs BUFOX

19% FI Score
  • bufox
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Buffalo Emerging Opportunities Fund

Expenses: 1.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare APRAX vs MAINX

19% FI Score
  • mainx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Matthews Asia Total Return Bond Fund Investor Class Shares

Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare APRAX vs RMBJX

19% FI Score
  • rmbjx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

RMB Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare APRAX vs NBREX

19% FI Score
  • nbrex
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Intrinsic Value Fund Class Trust

Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare APRAX vs HGDIX

19% FI Score
  • hgdix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

AAM/HIMCO Global Enhanced Dividend Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare APRAX vs DHROX

19% FI Score
  • dhrox
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Diamond Hill Research Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare APRAX vs NTKLX

19% FI Score
  • ntklx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Voya Multi-Manager International Small Cap Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare APRAX vs LPJAX

19% FI Score
  • lpjax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

BlackRock LifePath® Dynamic 2035 Fund Investor A Shares

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare APRAX vs CSMOX

19% FI Score
  • csmox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Chiron SMid Opportunities Fund Class I Shares

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare APRAX vs SIEPX

19% FI Score
  • siepx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Saratoga International Equity Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo