Expense Ratio Rating
2 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
1 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
1 /10
$APJAX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 10,038 International Stocks Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- rydhx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Rydex Dow Jones Industrial Average® Fund Class H
Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- rncox
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
RiverNorth Core Opportunity Fund Class R
Expenses: 1.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- qmlax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
Quantified Market Leaders Fund Advisor Class
Expenses: 2.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- ubpix
- Mutual Fund
- Alternative
- Leveraged Equities
ProFunds UltraLatin America Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »
- lpbcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
BlackRock LifePath® Dynamic 2025 Fund Investor C Shares
Expenses: 2.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- garbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Guinness Atkinson Renminbi Yuan & Bond Fund
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- supcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
DWS Multi-Asset Growth Allocation Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- tphix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Timothy Plan High Yield Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ryfsx
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Financial Services
Royce Global Financial Services Fund Service Class
Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »
- ioczx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
ICON Risk-Managed Balanced Fund Class S
Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- gndcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Invesco Global Low Volatility Equity Yield Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- rypdx
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Consumer Defensive
Rydex Consumer Products Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Consumer Defensive Sector Equity fund. See why »
- ugbp
- ETF
- Money Market
- World
Citigroup ETNs linked to the VelocityShares Daily 4X Long GBP vs. USD Index
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a World Money Market fund. See why »
- rycax
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Consumer Defensive
Rydex Consumer Products Fund Class H
Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Consumer Defensive Sector Equity fund. See why »
- ldpax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Leland Thomson Reuters Private Equity Buyout Index Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- rfbax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Government Bond
Davis Government Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ngvax
- Mutual Fund
- Commodities
- Broad
Nuveen Gresham Diversified Commodity Strategy Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »
- echax
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Future
AXS Chesapeake Strategy Fund Class A
Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »