Expense Ratio Rating
6 /10
Expense Rating
2 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
9 /10
$APDFX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- jgh
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Nuveen Global High Income Fund
Expenses: 2.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- nhiax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Neuberger Berman High Income Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dsu
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
BlackRock Debt Strategies Fund Inc
Expenses: 2.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bxfyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Barings Global Floating Rate Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- aioax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Columbia Income Opportunities Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- tuhyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
T. Rowe Price U.S. High Yield Fund
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mpfdx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Corporate Bond Portfolio Class I
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ahyhx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
American Century High-Yield Fund I Class
Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ekhyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Wells Fargo High Yield Bond Fund - Class Admin
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- sigax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Western Asset Corporate Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- cldix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Calvert Long-Term Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.63% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- sthtx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Virtus Seix High Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- myhcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
MainStay MacKay High Yield Corporate Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- clmax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Columbia Mortgage Opportunities Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mkhcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
MainStay MacKay High Yield Corporate Bond Fund Class B
Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- plrax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PIMCO Long Duration Total Return Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- plflx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ehi
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Western Asset Global High Income Fund
Expenses: 2.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- cif
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
MFS® Intermediate High Income Fund
Expenses: 2.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »