Expense Ratio Rating
0 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
0 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
0 /10
$AMRGX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 643 US Stocks Large Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- jpecx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
JPMorgan Tax Aware Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- sdgcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
DWS Capital Growth Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- arttx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Artisan Focus Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- jpfsx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
JPMorgan Equity Focus Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- dlqax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
BNY Mellon Large Cap Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- adsix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
American Century Disciplined Growth Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- wpasx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
AB Concentrated Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- dpuax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
BNY Mellon U.S. Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- ekoax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Wells Fargo Omega Growth Fund - Class A
Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »