AMCCX : American Beacon Mid-Cap Value Fund C Class

AMCCX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Value with HIGH fees.

AMCCX

American Beacon Mid-Cap Value Fund C Class

FI Score

22 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

0 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

4 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

4 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,182 US Stocks Mid-Cap Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare AMCCX vs ASEA

46% FI Score
  • asea
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AMCCX vs IAF

46% FI Score
  • iaf
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Other Region

Aberdeen Australia Equity Fund Inc

Expenses: 1.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Region International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AMCCX vs QCLN

46% FI Score
  • qcln
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Other

First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Allocation fund. See why »

Compare AMCCX vs FLADX

46% FI Score
  • fladx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Franklin LifeSmart™ 2040 Retirement Target Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.34% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare AMCCX vs RLTSX

46% FI Score
  • rltsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

RiverFront Asset Allocation Aggressive Class Investor II

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare AMCCX vs BGAFX

46% FI Score
  • bgafx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Baron Global Advantage Fund Retail Shares

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare AMCCX vs QID

46% FI Score
  • qid
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares UltraShort QQQ

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare AMCCX vs RAIIX

46% FI Score
  • raiix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Manning & Napier Rainier International Discovery Series Class I

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AMCCX vs MATFX

46% FI Score
  • matfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Matthews Asia Innovators Fund Investor Class Shares

Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AMCCX vs FSRBX

46% FI Score
  • fsrbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

Fidelity® Select Banking Portfolio

Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare AMCCX vs TAPR

46% FI Score
  • tapr
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

Barclays Inverse US Treasury Aggregate ETN

Expenses: 0.43% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare AMCCX vs PTSNX

46% FI Score
  • ptsnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

PIMCO Short Term Fund I-3

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare AMCCX vs JCLAX

46% FI Score
  • jclax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Aggressive Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare AMCCX vs COLCX

46% FI Score
  • colcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Columbia Tax-Exempt Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare AMCCX vs IVIOX

46% FI Score
  • iviox
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

IVA International Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AMCCX vs FFTGX

46% FI Score
  • fftgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Salient Tactical Growth Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare AMCCX vs FDEU

46% FI Score
  • fdeu
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Europe Stock

First Trust Dynamic Europe Equity Income

Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AMCCX vs CNXT

46% FI Score
  • cnxt
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AMCCX vs ITRAX

46% FI Score
  • itrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

VY® T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare AMCCX vs POAAX

46% FI Score
  • poaax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Conservative Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo