Expense Ratio Rating
9 /10
Expense Rating
6 /10
Market Score
10 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
10 /10
$AMBFX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 748 Allocation All-In-One funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- hckax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Hartford Checks and Balances Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- mckix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
MainStay Conservative Allocation Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.13% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- jnbsx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
JPMorgan Income Builder Fund Class I Shares
Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- aok
- ETF
- Allocation
- All-In-One
iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF
Expenses: 0.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- ogiax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
JPMorgan Investor Balanced Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- llaix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
QS Moderate Growth Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.14% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- ndarx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
American Funds Retirement Income Portfolio - Enhanced Class A
Expenses: 0.36% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- rbbax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Columbia Income Builder Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.38% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- hcksx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Hartford Checks and Balances Fund Class R4
Expenses: 0.43% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »