Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$ALPCX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 566 US Stocks Large Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- cbbcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
AB Relative Value Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.64% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- bwlcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
American Beacon Bridgeway Large Cap Value Fund C Class
Expenses: 1.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- pneax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
AllianzGI Dividend Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- bvefx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Becker Value Equity Fund Retail Class
Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- olvcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
JPMorgan Large Cap Value Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- ladix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
ClearBridge Tactical Dividend Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- miisx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
BNY Mellon Income Stock Fund Investor shares
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- smvlx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Smead Value Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- npncx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.82% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »