Expense Ratio Rating
6 /10
Expense Rating
3 /10
Market Score
10 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
10 /10
$AICFX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 668 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- afifx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
American Funds Fundamental Investors® Class F-1
Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- omfl
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- sssvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
State Street Equity 500 Index Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.28% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- brgnx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
iShares Russell 1000 Large-Cap Index Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.13% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- prilx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Parnassus Core Equity Fund - Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.63% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- prdgx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund
Expenses: 0.62% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- fitlx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Fidelity® US Sustainability Index Fund
Expenses: 0.11% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- bbus
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF
Expenses: 0.02% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- jhml
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF
Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »