Expense Ratio Rating
7 /10
Expense Rating
3 /10
Market Score
10 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
10 /10
$AHITX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 8,623 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- qglcx
- Mutual Fund
- Commodities
- Focused
The Gold Bullion Strategy Fund Advisor Class
Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »
- rsiyx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Blend
Victory RS Investors Fund Class Y
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- sislx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Blend
Shelton International Select Equity Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »
- zdivx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Zacks Dividend Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- svscx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
State Street Dynamic Small Cap Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- ssefx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Blend
AMG SouthernSun U.S. Equity Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- wfdex
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Wells Fargo Diversified Equity Fund - Class C
Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- ryjcx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternative
- Inverse
Rydex Inverse Government Long Bond Strategy Fund Class C
Expenses: 5.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »
- rgsax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
AllianzGI Global Small-Cap Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »