Expense Ratio Rating
3 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
7 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
7 /10
$AGGRX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- goat
- ETF
- Allocation
- Total World
VanEck Vectors Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF
Expenses: 0.56% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- ivinx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Ivy Global Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- gmaax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Aberdeen Diversified Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.57% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- aqgnx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
AQR Global Equity Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- epskx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
MainStay Epoch Global Equity Yield Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- jogex
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
JOHCM Global Equity Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- eadix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Dividend Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- rwde
- ETF
- Allocation
- Total World
Direxion MSCI Developed Over Emerging Markets ETF
Expenses: 0.53% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- kldw
- ETF
- Allocation
- Total World
Knowledge Leaders Developed World ETF
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »