Expense Ratio Rating
6 /10
Expense Rating
3 /10
Market Score
10 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
10 /10
$AFIFX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- mvgax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
MFS Low Volatility Global Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- oosnx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco Oppenheimer Senior Floating Rate Fund Class R
Expenses: 1.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mwflx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Metropolitan West Floating Rate Income Fund Class I Shares
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- qlenx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Short
AQR Long-Short Equity Fund Class N
Expenses: 2.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »
- nbcrx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
American Funds Retirement Income Portfolio - Moderate Class C
Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- eagmx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- rrfix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Government Bond
Federated Real Return Bond Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pej
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Consumer Cyclicals
Invesco Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment ETF
Expenses: 0.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Consumer Cyclicals Sector Equity fund. See why »
- ediix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Eaton Vance Global Income Builder Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »