Expense Ratio Rating
3 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$AFGGX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- palcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
AllianzGI Global Allocation Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- nwwox
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Virtus Vontobel Global Opportunities Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- seefx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Saturna Sustainable Equity Fund
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- gdmix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Lazard Global Dynamic Multi-Asset Portfolio Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- hrlsx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Hartford Global Real Asset Fund Class R4
Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- wtmvx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Segall Bryant & Hamill Global Large Cap Fund Retail Class
Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- evgbx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Evermore Global Value Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- hdavx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Janus Henderson Dividend & Income Builder Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- fhgix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Federated Hermes Global Equity Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »