AFCSX : American Century Focused International Growth Fund I Class

AFCSX is a International Stocks Market Large Growth with MODERATE fees.

AFCSX

American Century Focused International Growth Fund I Class

FI Score

26 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

0 /10

Category Score

8 /10

Market Size

0 /10

Different Funds

We found 9,394 International Stocks Large Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare AFCSX vs AGAQX

39% FI Score
  • agaqx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

361 Global Long/Short Equity Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 2.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare AFCSX vs AGOCX

39% FI Score
  • agocx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

PGIM Jennison Global Equity Income Fund- Class C

Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare AFCSX vs IHIYX

39% FI Score
  • ihiyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Transamerica High Yield Bond A

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare AFCSX vs FEFAX

39% FI Score
  • fefax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

First Eagle Fund of America Class A

Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AFCSX vs PWS

39% FI Score
  • pws
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Pacer WealthShield ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare AFCSX vs ITTSX

39% FI Score
  • ittsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Hartford Multi-Asset Income and Growth Fund Class R4

Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare AFCSX vs MMDAX

39% FI Score
  • mmdax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Madison Moderate Allocation Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare AFCSX vs MRCGX

39% FI Score
  • mrcgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Meridian Growth Fund® Class C

Expenses: 1.87% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AFCSX vs MSCCX

39% FI Score
  • msccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

MainStay MacKay California Tax Free Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare AFCSX vs JFFCX

39% FI Score
  • jffcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

JPMorgan SmartRetirement® 2055 Fund Class C

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare AFCSX vs JJA

39% FI Score
  • jja
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

iPath Series B Bloomberg Agriculture Subindex Total Return ETN

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare AFCSX vs MTQKX

39% FI Score
  • mtqkx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Manning & Napier Target 2035 Series Class K

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare AFCSX vs MWHYX

39% FI Score
  • mwhyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Metropolitan West High Yield Bond Fund Class M

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare AFCSX vs JHMA

39% FI Score
  • jhma
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

John Hancock Multifactor Materials ETF

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare AFCSX vs FRNRX

39% FI Score
  • frnrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Franklin Natural Resources Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare AFCSX vs TQSMX

39% FI Score
  • tqsmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small & Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund

Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AFCSX vs SCCYX

39% FI Score
  • sccyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Carillon Reams Core Bond Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare AFCSX vs NPNCX

39% FI Score
  • npncx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.82% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AFCSX vs LBFIX

38% FI Score
  • lbfix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

ClearBridge Select Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AFCSX vs LITCX

38% FI Score
  • litcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Columbia Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo