AFCSX : American Century Focused International Growth Fund I Class

AFCSX is a International Stocks Market Large Growth with MODERATE fees.

AFCSX

American Century Focused International Growth Fund I Class

FI Score

26 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

0 /10

Category Score

8 /10

Market Size

0 /10

Different Funds

We found 9,394 International Stocks Large Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare AFCSX vs USHYX

47% FI Score
  • ushyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

USAA High Income Fund

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare AFCSX vs CHAD

47% FI Score
  • chad
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bear 1X Shares

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare AFCSX vs DGLAX

47% FI Score
  • dglax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

BNY Mellon Global Stock Fund - Class A

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare AFCSX vs FCMVX

47% FI Score
  • fcmvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Fidelity® Mid Cap Value K6 Fund

Expenses: 0.44% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AFCSX vs FESGX

47% FI Score
  • fesgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

First Eagle Global Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare AFCSX vs OSINX

47% FI Score
  • osinx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Invesco Oppenheimer Global Strategic Income Class R

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare AFCSX vs TUNIX

47% FI Score
  • tunix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Transamerica Unconstrained Bond Class I

Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare AFCSX vs BASIX

47% FI Score
  • basix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

BlackRock Strategic Income Opportunities Portfolio Investor A Shares

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare AFCSX vs UXABX

47% FI Score
  • uxabx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

USAA California Bond Fund Adviser Shares

Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare AFCSX vs COSIX

47% FI Score
  • cosix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Columbia Strategic Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare AFCSX vs JCUIX

47% FI Score
  • jcuix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Money Market
  • World

John Hancock Funds Absolute Return Currency Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a World Money Market fund. See why »

Compare AFCSX vs SGG

47% FI Score
  • sgg
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

iPath Series B Bloomberg Sugar Subindex Total Return ETN

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare AFCSX vs STOT

47% FI Score
  • stot
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

SPDR DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare AFCSX vs CAPAX

47% FI Score
  • capax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Federated Capital Income Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare AFCSX vs FPL

47% FI Score
  • fpl
  • Mutual Fund
  • Other
  • Master Limited Partnership

First Trust New Opps MLP & Energy Fund

Expenses: 2.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Master Limited Partnership Other fund. See why »

Compare AFCSX vs ERBIX

47% FI Score
  • erbix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein Equity Strategy Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare AFCSX vs STSCX

47% FI Score
  • stscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Sterling Capital Stratton Small Cap Value Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AFCSX vs PRROX

47% FI Score
  • prrox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Putnam RetirementReady 2025 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare AFCSX vs PFIAX

47% FI Score
  • pfiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PIMCO Low Duration Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare AFCSX vs EIDIX

47% FI Score
  • eidix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Dividend Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo