Diversification Rating
0 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
6 /10
Expense Rating
3 /10
Market Score
2 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
2 /10
We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
361 Global Long/Short Equity Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 2.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »
PGIM Jennison Global Equity Income Fund- Class C
Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Transamerica High Yield Bond A
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
Hartford Multi-Asset Income and Growth Fund Class R4
Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
AQR Emerging Multi-Style Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
Royce International Premier Fund Service Class
Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »
Madison Moderate Allocation Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
MainStay MacKay California Tax Free Opportunities Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
JPMorgan SmartRetirement® 2055 Fund Class C
Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
iPath Series B Bloomberg Agriculture Subindex Total Return ETN
Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »
Manning & Napier Target 2035 Series Class K
Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
Metropolitan West High Yield Bond Fund Class M
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
John Hancock Multifactor Materials ETF
Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »
Franklin Natural Resources Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »
Carillon Reams Core Bond Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
Global X Scientific Beta Japan ETF
Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »
Columbia Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
PortfolioPlus Developed Markets ETF
Expenses: 0.51% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »
PIMCO RealPath Blend 2025 Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.
Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!
Join & Get Your First Course Free© 2025 Adam Fortuna
Site Map