ACSI : American Customer Satisfaction ETF

ACSI is a US Stocks Market Large Blend with MODERATE fees.

ACSI

American Customer Satisfaction ETF

FI Score

42 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

3 /10

Market Score

2 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

2 /10

Different Funds

We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ACSI vs AGAQX

39% FI Score
  • agaqx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

361 Global Long/Short Equity Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 2.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs AGOCX

39% FI Score
  • agocx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

PGIM Jennison Global Equity Income Fund- Class C

Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs IHIYX

39% FI Score
  • ihiyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Transamerica High Yield Bond A

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs PWS

39% FI Score
  • pws
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Pacer WealthShield ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs ITTSX

39% FI Score
  • ittsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Hartford Multi-Asset Income and Growth Fund Class R4

Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs QEENX

39% FI Score
  • qeenx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

AQR Emerging Multi-Style Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs RYIPX

39% FI Score
  • ryipx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Royce International Premier Fund Service Class

Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs MMDAX

39% FI Score
  • mmdax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Madison Moderate Allocation Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs MSCCX

39% FI Score
  • msccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

MainStay MacKay California Tax Free Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs JFFCX

39% FI Score
  • jffcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

JPMorgan SmartRetirement® 2055 Fund Class C

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs JJA

39% FI Score
  • jja
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

iPath Series B Bloomberg Agriculture Subindex Total Return ETN

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs MTQKX

39% FI Score
  • mtqkx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Manning & Napier Target 2035 Series Class K

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs MWHYX

39% FI Score
  • mwhyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Metropolitan West High Yield Bond Fund Class M

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs JHMA

39% FI Score
  • jhma
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

John Hancock Multifactor Materials ETF

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs FRNRX

39% FI Score
  • frnrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Franklin Natural Resources Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs SCCYX

39% FI Score
  • sccyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Carillon Reams Core Bond Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs SCIJ

39% FI Score
  • scij
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Japan Stock

Global X Scientific Beta Japan ETF

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs LITCX

38% FI Score
  • litcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Columbia Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs PPDM

38% FI Score
  • ppdm
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

PortfolioPlus Developed Markets ETF

Expenses: 0.51% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs PPZAX

38% FI Score
  • ppzax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

PIMCO RealPath Blend 2025 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo