ACSI : American Customer Satisfaction ETF

ACSI is a US Stocks Market Large Blend with MODERATE fees.

ACSI

American Customer Satisfaction ETF

FI Score

42 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

3 /10

Market Score

2 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

2 /10

Different Funds

We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ACSI vs JACSX

45% FI Score
  • jacsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

JPMorgan SmartRetirement® Blend 2060 Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.38% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs JAGTX

45% FI Score
  • jagtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class T

Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs JHMF

45% FI Score
  • jhmf
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

John Hancock Multifactor Financials ETF

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs NFLT

45% FI Score
  • nflt
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs NIQTX

45% FI Score
  • niqtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Neuberger Berman International Equity Fund Trust Class

Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs UVABX

45% FI Score
  • uvabx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

USAA Virginia Bond Fund Adviser Shares

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs OGICX

45% FI Score
  • ogicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Oppenheimer Global Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs JSMCX

45% FI Score
  • jsmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

JPMorgan SmartRetirement® 2030 Fund Class C

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs USCGX

45% FI Score
  • uscgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

USAA Capital Growth Fund

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs VMFIX

45% FI Score
  • vmfix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Intermediate Bond Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs PAWZ

45% FI Score
  • pawz
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Other

ProShares Pet Care ETF

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs MGIIX

45% FI Score
  • mgiix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

BMO Strategic Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs OPBNX

45% FI Score
  • opbnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Invesco Oppenheimer Total Return Bond Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs MFAPX

45% FI Score
  • mfapx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. International Advantage Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs ABYIX

45% FI Score
  • abyix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs AIIEX

45% FI Score
  • aiiex
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Invesco International Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs AILCX

45% FI Score
  • ailcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

American Beacon International Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.87% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs ARBFX

45% FI Score
  • arbfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

The Arbitrage Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs ARBVX

45% FI Score
  • arbvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice 2020 Portfolio Investor Class

Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs ARCVX

45% FI Score
  • arcvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice 2030 Portfolio Investor Class

Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo