ACSI : American Customer Satisfaction ETF

ACSI is a US Stocks Market Large Blend with MODERATE fees.

ACSI

American Customer Satisfaction ETF

FI Score

42 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

3 /10

Market Score

2 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

2 /10

Different Funds

We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ACSI vs JCLBX

48% FI Score
  • jclbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Balanced Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs JDGTX

48% FI Score
  • jdgtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Janus Henderson Global Income Managed Volatility Fund Class T

Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs JHMS

48% FI Score
  • jhms
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Defensive

John Hancock Multifactor Consumer Staples ETF

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Defensive Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs JMUTX

48% FI Score
  • jmutx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Janus Henderson Multi-Sector Income Fund Class T

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs JOF

48% FI Score
  • jof
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Japan Stock

Japan Smaller Capitalization Fund

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs SHYL

48% FI Score
  • shyl
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Xtrackers Short Duration High Yield Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs POBAX

48% FI Score
  • pobax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs PQTNX

48% FI Score
  • pqtnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class I-3

Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs TWMIX

48% FI Score
  • twmix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

American Century Emerging Markets Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs PRRWX

48% FI Score
  • prrwx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Putnam RetirementReady 2035 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs PRUAX

48% FI Score
  • pruax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Utilities

PGIM Jennison Utility Fund- Class A

Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Utilities Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs SDOW

48% FI Score
  • sdow
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs SMGAX

48% FI Score
  • smgax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Allocation Fund Class F

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs SQQQ

48% FI Score
  • sqqq
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs SVTAX

48% FI Score
  • svtax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

SEI Institutional Managed Trust Global Managed Volatility Fund Class F

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs TGRIX

48% FI Score
  • tgrix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

American Century International Growth Fund I Class

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs TINGX

48% FI Score
  • tingx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Thornburg International Growth Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs TNA

48% FI Score
  • tna
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares

Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs USNYX

48% FI Score
  • usnyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

USAA New York Bond Fund

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs VKMMX

48% FI Score
  • vkmmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Invesco Municipal Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo