Expense Ratio Rating
2 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$ACOAX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 748 Allocation All-In-One funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- ctfax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Columbia Thermostat Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- cagix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Calvert Growth Allocation Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.15% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- pvsax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Putnam Capital Spectrum Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- nadmx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderate Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.53% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- aadax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Invesco Select Risk: Growth Investor Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- aceix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Invesco Equity and Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- fsdix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Fidelity® Strategic Dividend & Income® Fund
Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- ftcox
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Franklin Corefolio Allocation Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.44% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- fsanx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Fidelity Asset Manager® 60% Fund
Expenses: 0.69% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »