ACHCX : American Beacon Crescent Short Duration High Income Fund C Class

ACHCX is a Bond Market High Yield Bond with HIGH fees.

ACHCX

American Beacon Crescent Short Duration High Income Fund C Class

FI Score

11 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

3 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

3 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ACHCX vs IAALX

36% FI Score
  • iaalx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Transamerica Asset Allocation Growth Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ACHCX vs PJIZX

36% FI Score
  • pjizx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

PGIM QMA International Equity Fund- Class Z

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ACHCX vs PMACX

36% FI Score
  • pmacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Pioneer Multi-Asset Income Fund C

Expenses: 1.64% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ACHCX vs MCFOX

36% FI Score
  • mcfox
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

BlackRock Large Cap Focus Growth Fund Investor C Shares

Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ACHCX vs PMVAX

36% FI Score
  • pmvax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Putnam Sustainable Future Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ACHCX vs JCRIX

36% FI Score
  • jcrix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Commodities
  • Broad

ALPS/CoreCommodity Management CompleteCommodities Strategy Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare ACHCX vs JVIAX

36% FI Score
  • jviax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Virtus Vontobel Foreign Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ACHCX vs KGIIX

36% FI Score
  • kgiix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Kopernik International Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ACHCX vs POMCX

36% FI Score
  • pomcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ACHCX vs TYWSX

36% FI Score
  • tywsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

AMG GW&K Emerging Wealth Equity Fund - Class I

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ACHCX vs GEMCX

36% FI Score
  • gemcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ACHCX vs RISAX

36% FI Score
  • risax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Manning & Napier Rainier International Discovery Series Class S

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ACHCX vs SBTIX

36% FI Score
  • sbtix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Salient Tactical Plus Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ACHCX vs SCICX

36% FI Score
  • scicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Columbia Seligman Communications and Information Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ACHCX vs SDVSX

36% FI Score
  • sdvsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Sit Dividend Growth Fund Class S

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ACHCX vs SENAX

36% FI Score
  • senax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Wells Fargo Enterprise Fund - Class A

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ACHCX vs SGQAX

36% FI Score
  • sgqax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

DWS International Growth Fund - Class A

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ACHCX vs STSAX

36% FI Score
  • stsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Wells Fargo Common Stock Fund - Class C

Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ACHCX vs VARBX

36% FI Score
  • varbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

Vivaldi Merger Arbitrage Fund Class I

Expenses: 2.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ACHCX vs PBFDX

36% FI Score
  • pbfdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Payson Total Return Fund

Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo