Expense Ratio Rating
6 /10
Expense Rating
2 /10
Market Score
10 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
10 /10
$ACEIX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 9,682 Allocation All-In-One funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- pxh
- ETF
- International Stocks
- Emerging Markets
Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
- pcy
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- rpv
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF
Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- dtd
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund
Expenses: 0.28% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- otcfx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Stock Fund
Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- eildx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Government Bond
Eaton Vance Short Duration Government Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- gwx
- ETF
- International Stocks
- Mid-Cap Blend
SPDR S&P International Small Cap ETF
Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Blend International Stocks fund. See why »
- fdn
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Technology
First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund
Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
- ffhcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Fidelity® Series Floating Rate High Income Fund
Expenses: 0.01% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »