Expense Ratio Rating
4 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$ABFAX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 9,682 Allocation All-In-One funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- shyd
- ETF
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
VanEck Vectors Short High-Yield Municipal Index ETF
Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- spxu
- ETF
- Alternative
- Inverse
ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500
Expenses: 0.91% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »
- srhqx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Principal Short-Term Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.69% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- twcux
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
American Century Ultra® Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- tweix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
American Century Equity Income Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 0.91% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- xme
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Basic Materials
SPDR S&P Metals and Mining ETF
Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »
- cmvix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Growth Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.62% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- pyhix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Principal High Income Fund Class Institutional
Expenses: 0.61% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- qarp
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US QARP ETF
Expenses: 0.19% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »