Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$ABCCX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 748 Allocation All-In-One funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- hbacx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Hartford Moderate Allocation Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- rpfcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Davis Appreciation & Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- fdiv
- ETF
- Allocation
- All-In-One
First Trust Strategic Income ETF
Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- dboax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
BNY Mellon Balanced Opportunity Fund - Class A
Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- bcgax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Sterling Capital Diversified Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- qibgx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Federated MDT Balanced Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- dfbax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Delaware Strategic Allocation Class A
Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- abpax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
AB Conservative Wealth Strategy Class A
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- mgxbx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
MainStay Growth Allocation Fund Class B
Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »