Diversification Rating
6 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
8 /10
Expense Rating
3 /10
Market Score
10 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
10 /10
$AAXJ Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 10,038 International Stocks Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- ryhdx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Rydex High Yield Strategy Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ryhgx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Rydex High Yield Strategy Fund Class H
Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ryrhx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Rydex Russell 2000 Fund Class H
Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- ryrix
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Consumer Cyclical
Rydex Retailing Fund Class Investor
Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Consumer Cyclical Sector Equity fund. See why »
- rysdx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternative
- Inverse
Rydex Strengthening Dollar 2x Strategy Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.82% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »
- rysvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Value
Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- sgpix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
ProFunds Small Cap Growth Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.65% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- vircx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
Invesco Balanced-Risk Retirement Now Fund Class CX
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- tvecx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Guggenheim RBP® Dividend Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »